Could not agree more
]]>She brought it on herself and had what was coming to her. If she had a time machine she’d probably think twice about hanging out to dry members of the opposition for similar tax planning tactics. She also didn’t seek expert tax advice despite being advised of this. It’s a ridiculous state of affairs to end your career like this. But that is what modern politics is. You can’t ignore these circumstances.
]]>ALL LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
]]>It’s a tax issue. If they find she failed to pay, she gets a chance to rectify it. Why the media circus and over reaction?
Politicians are not higher beings who should be held to higher standards. Whatever the usual penalty is for any regular citizen in her position, should be what she gets.
Let’s stop with the sanctimonious BS and holding others to higher standards, and let’s ask the key question – is she any good at her job? If she is, she should stay. If she isn’t, then perhaps she should go – but either way, it should have nothing to do with her personal life or tax affairs. If it was you, would you expect to have to resign?!
It’s time we focused on what matters rather than losing sight of the fact that politicians are only human too.
FFS.
]]>Only problems is we have lots of evidence of multiple other MPs doing dubious/ unethical stuff and none left
]]>The advice was to take advice!
]]>With a housing crisis and the cost of homes being pushed up by people hoarding property that they don’t need,
why on earth should we be taking lessons from this bunch of morons?
At least the Tories don’t claim to be against wealth and privilege.
]]>What are you on about?
Why would there be interest involved? You don’t know the trust’s assets so why you think they’d need a mortgage is a mystery.
As is why, if they did need to borrow, you think it was at 0%.
But not as mysterious as the fact that you think that when you take out a mortgage, you borrow the amount it will be worth when you finally sell the house. And that your available credit is based on what you’ll earn 15 years later assuming you win a deputy leadership contest and then a general election.
Nah, forget all that. Most mysterious is the fact that you don’t understand what a married couple is.
Nope, still not plumbed the deepest depth yet.
You also don’t understand the concept of a deposit on a mortgage.
You obviously have never taken out a mortgage.
]]>All this news about politicians distract us from the complete waste of spaces people like Rayner,Farage,Corbyn Thatcher etc are. The fact that we can comment makes us feel we have democracy. we do not and sooner we realise that the better.
]]>I have read a book about our wars especially the 2nd world war when many people, be they soldiers, farmers, house wives, doctors nurses … the list is endless and they all say that they had all been let down,trodden on and any hope had been taken away. …I wonder what they would all say now …..
]]>This is the same party that has a business secretary who openly misrepresented himself as a solicitor both online and in Parliament. What happened? Nothing.
]]>If Shoosmiths were. The in-dependant trustee how did they satisfy themselves that it in the child’s best interest to pay his mother such a large sum for 25% when he was already living in the property? Presumably his parents were not going to kick the child out. It seems odd to make such a large payment bearing no interest when he has lived there for 9 years already.
Who gave advice on the value of the house at £650,000?
Who advanced this woman £650,000 with her current. Salary £67,505 as a minister and £93,904 as an MP and can anyone else borrow on the same terms?