Comments on: Taylor v Catterall: rumble in the public law jungle?

By: Anon

Sat, 05 Mar 2022 10:53:01 +0000

Has to be one of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen in boxing.

Thanks for the article!

]]>

By: 😩

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:14:55 +0000

Judicial review has no place in regulating the behaviour or actions of sports governing bodies. Contractual remedies and a claim in contract is the correct place for this. Once you expand the meaning of “public body” where does that end? How many more claims will be brought to an already backlogged system?

]]>

By: G

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 11:25:27 +0000

In reply to You won, but at what cost?.

The fact that Max had the audacity to change his number to #1 is completely taking the mick.

So tactless lol

You can tell he initially chose 33 as a mimicry to Lewis’s 44

]]>

By: Al

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 11:19:49 +0000

If there was ever an argument for bringing back trial by combat then surely it was this case?

]]>

By: You won, but at what cost?

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:42:32 +0000

I personally don’t know how the Josh Taylor’s and Max Verstappen’s can go on with the W knowing there is an asterisk in the win and everyone is debating over the validity of their victory.

]]>

By: SportsHead

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:39:16 +0000

Sports in general is in a state of controversy at the moment.

The VAR and poor refereeing in football.

The Michael Masi inconsistent decision making in F1.

]]>

By: Boxing Fan

Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:07:09 +0000

It was not a UD, SD… One judge scored 113-112 Catterrall.

]]>