Comments on: Former City law firm senior partner defends BigLaw’s Trump deals https://www.legalcheek.com/2025/04/former-city-law-firm-senior-partner-defends-biglaws-trump-deals/ Legal news, insider insight and careers advice Mon, 07 Apr 2025 15:57:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 By: Disgruntled of Abbotsbury https://www.legalcheek.com/2025/04/former-city-law-firm-senior-partner-defends-biglaws-trump-deals/#comment-1211616 Mon, 07 Apr 2025 15:57:09 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=217921#comment-1211616 Poor response. All BigLaw firms which have folded to Trump can kiss goodbye to any perception that they are serving the social good.

Facilitating commercial activity means nothing without the rule of law. Commercial activity is unreliable and unsustainable without the rule of law. If BigLaw is so important to commerce (as Geffen claims) , then why not prove it by leveraging their ‘essential’ bargaining power to challenge a wayward executive branch?

If BigLaw can’t flex their muscles to help save the American republic (or are unwilling to do so), then that means they are far more expendable – and I daresay irrelevant – to commerce and wider society than their glossy brochures would have us believe. But it cannot cut both ways.

]]>
By: Just askin’ https://www.legalcheek.com/2025/04/former-city-law-firm-senior-partner-defends-biglaws-trump-deals/#comment-1211599 Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:35:48 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=217921#comment-1211599 “Unwinnable fight”: is that because the rule of law has been torn up in the US? If so, then these firms folding is a damning incitement.

]]>