Congrats!

TikTok is buzzing this morning as Gen Z school leavers share the moment they discovered whether their A-Level results had secured them a place at their dream law school.

Students across the country received their A-Level results today, with UCAS figures showing a record number securing their first-choice university place in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Legal Cheek has been trawling TikTok for some of the best reactions from students discovering they’re off to law school — and we’ve rounded up a few we’ve spotted. If you’re in need of some Thursday morning positivity, these clips are well worth a watch.

@a.sewax i opened those results and i just knew. i am officially studying law guys #chichesteruniversity #results #resultsday #alevels #alevelresultsday2025 ♬ original sound –

@kanteeng i hate a-levels, hope everyone did okay #alevels #alevels2025 #ucas #lawschool #imgonnacry ♬ Ode to Joy- Symphony No.9 in D Minor 'choral' – Lorne Balfe & Russell Emanuel & Steve Kofsky

@lunaazgan #duet with @Luna #resultsday I am not non chalant I cried my eyes out #alevels #fyp #law ♬ original sound – kaleboat

@alizayyy.ms project brampton manor #alevels #projectbramptonmanor #alevelresults2025 #pakistani #lawstudent #russelgroupuni #punjabi ♬ You know what inspires me – minajchun

@not.ttillie Thank god for that x #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #alevels #resultsday #yorkuni #law ♬ Originalton – TAYLAN

@notsosecretlifeofemma Still in shock #alevels #foryou #resultsday #results #fyp ♬ original sound – C1zthetic

@lae_stratford What, like it’s hard? #fyp #laes #laestratford #loveisland #ucl #law #alevels #resultsday ♬ original sound – LAE Stratford

@shrottyshayslays #alevelresultsday #resultsday #exeterlaw ♬ original sound – shaynatiana

University of Exeter law student Sajanthiya Siridaran challenges pre-conceptions around the type of students that make great lawyers

I used to think I couldn’t be a good lawyer because I was quiet. When people think of lawyers, they often imagine naturally loud, confident, and bold personalities — always ready to argue and often expected to be the most commanding voice in the room. I believed this too, which made me uncomfortable as a naturally shy and introverted person.

I felt as if I didn’t fit the traditional image of what a lawyer should be. I wasn’t naturally argumentative or a confident speaker. I didn’t necessarily enjoy the spotlight, and I already found myself feeling like an outsider in an industry I was just starting to get into. It was as if I were experiencing a different kind of impostor syndrome, which was hardly the confidence boost I hoped for at the start of my legal career! However, I have come to realise that confidence in law doesn’t always have to be loud.

My name is Sajanthiya, and I have just completed my first year studying law at university. And this is what I have learned so far.

How I fell for the loud-lawyer myth and tried to change

I was convinced that being a good lawyer meant being extroverted, sharp-witted, and effortlessly persuasive. So, I made it my mission to ‘fix’ myself.

I signed up for mooting competitions, volunteered at open days, and took up speaking roles in mock tribunals to improve my public speaking skills and confidence. And I am glad I did because those experiences pulled me out of my shell, helped me build my confidence, and develop my public speaking skills. I would highly recommend these opportunities to fellow law students because they can offer real and rewarding growth, and they can help more than you would expect.

However, one of these experiences taught me a deeper lesson — not public speaking or voice projection — but something that completely changed how I saw myself as a law student.

A mock tribunal that changed my perspective

During a mock tribunal, I volunteered to play the role of a cross-examining barrister in another attempt to improve my confidence. Thanks to film and TV, I imagined the role would require fierce questioning, quick thinking and bold delivery. I thought a good cross-examination depended on intensity, volume and pressure. However, when it came to my cross-examination, I took a different approach. I was not loud or assertive, but I was calm and thoroughly prepared.

And it worked.

The real secret: preparation, not projection

I had mistakenly believed that advocacy was about putting on a performance, but it wasn’t my ‘performance’ that won the moment. Instead, it was the preparation and observation I did in silence.

I had spent hours behind the scenes reading witness statements, studying case details and carefully crafting my questions. These were the tools that played to my strengths as someone who tends to be reflective and detail focused. That’s when I realised: my silence was a strength, not a weakness.

Why silence is a strength, not a weakness

Being a lawyer definitely requires public speaking skills and confidence; they are vital. But I had wrongly assumed that being quiet, introverted and observant were qualities I had to leave behind. Ironically, in trying to boost my confidence and become more extroverted, I have seen the value of my quieter qualities.

You don’t have to be the loudest in the room to be a good lawyer because a good lawyer also knows how to listen closely, think critically, when to speak and when not to.

If you’re a shy or introverted law student feeling like you don’t fit into the legal world, give yourself a chance. Throw yourself into those uncomfortable opportunities. Build your public speaking skills. Push your boundaries. Get out of your comfort zone. But don’t throw away what makes you, you.

Law needs all kinds of voices; both the loud and quiet ones. It needs strategic thinking, prepared voices, and quiet confidence. We need to stop believing in the myth that there is a single mold that you have to fit into to be a good lawyer, and instead break the mold.

So, whether you’re stepping into a mooting competition, a mock tribunal, or a real tribunal, confidence doesn’t always roar; sometimes it prepares quietly, observes patiently, and speaks with clarity when it matters most.

Sajanthiya Siridaran is a first-year Law with Business student at the University of Exeter with a strong interest in family and human rights law. She hopes to practise in these areas in the future and is particularly passionate about legal aid and access to justice for vulnerable groups.

S.K. Amir, University of London LLM graduate, examines how Gen Z is influencing change within law

For years, the legal profession has been an industry defined by tradition: with billable hours, hierarchical firm structures, and a “sink-or-swim” atmosphere that endorses overwork instead of a work-life balance. However, Generation Z’s entry into the profession has caused subtle but significant changes in legal organisations.

Because Gen Z lawyers and law students come from a more socially conscious and digitally connected generation, they place more emphasis on values such as transparency and emotional well-being. Generation Z has begun to reconstruct what a legal career entails, ranging from grassroots online advocacy to discussions concerning mental health. These subtle changes have begun to shift the legal industry’s culture from within.

How the legal profession has gone online

In order to share legal knowledge and highlight their professional expertise, Gen Z lawyers in the UK are increasingly using social media sites like LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTok. A large number of young solicitors and aspiring barristers in the UK create “Know Your Rights” videos, frequently posted on TikTok, which aim to educate viewers on their legal rights. These videos make legal information more approachable and relatable for younger audiences.

One such examples is the well-known TikTok creator and solicitor @theblacklawyer (real name: Tobiloba Adeyemi) who creates brief educational videos about UK legal rights, such as housing issues, police powers, and stop and search procedures. His material seeks to teach Gen Z viewers how to use the legal system and recognise their rights in commonplace circumstances. The influence of these “lawfluencers” on YouTube and TikTok is demonstrated by the fact that social media campaigns about topics like criminal justice reform and student loan relief have gotten far more traction than traditional media coverage.

Meanwhile, UK legal institutions are starting to realize how effective social media is as a tool for outreach. Gen Z’s digital fluency enables them to interact with the public in ways that legal professionals from other generations struggle to. The Law Society of England and Wales has recognised that younger generations are driving change in the way that legal information is accessed and shared.

A new transparent approach to mental health

In contrast to earlier generations, Gen Z lawyers are more likely to be open about mental health, talking candidly about issues like burnout and therapy. According to a 2024 Mental Health UK survey, one in three employees between the ages of 18 and 24 took time off because of stress, whereas only one in ten employees over the age of 55 did the same. With younger workers more likely to seek therapy, take mental health days, and support self-care, this demonstrates a generational shift towards emphasising psychological safety in the workplace.

In order to promote an open culture, Gen Z uses social media sites like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok to share personal narratives, de-stigmatise therapy, and inform peers about mental health issues. However, stigma still exists, according to a 2022 McKinsey Health Institute study.

In response, younger professionals and lawyers are pushing for changes like flexible work schedules and “no-email” weekends in UK workplaces.

A different attitude to professional success

Success for Generation Z in the UK is increasingly determined by personal autonomy and purpose-driven work rather than just by status or income. Legal Business claims that Gen Z lawyers in the UK are increasingly looking for jobs that fit with their personal values, putting social impact and work-life balance ahead of the conventional appeal of high-paying jobs in big law firms.

A dedication to social responsibility among younger legal professionals is shown by organisations such as LawWorks, which assist UK solicitors and law students in offering free legal advice to people and community groups who cannot afford it and are not eligible for legal aid.

Personal autonomy and flexibility are also valued highly by this generation. According to a Fiverr survey conducted in 2024, 44% of Gen Zers in the UK (those between the ages of 16 and 26) stated that flexible working hours were their top career priority, demonstrating a strong preference for autonomy over traditional 9–5 jobs. Gen Z lawyers are no exception: according to a report by Trowers & Hamlins, this generation expects inclusive, collaborative cultures where psychological safety, emotional intelligence, and flexibility are just as crucial as technical proficiency

Established legal institutions are responding to these changing preferences. To appeal to this values-driven generation, they have implemented ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and diversity-focused positions. In an effort to promote social mobility within the industry, Simmons & Simmons, for example, has committed that 20% of its partners will be from lower socioeconomic backgrounds by 2029.

Gen Z vs law firm culture

The rise of Generation Z professionals in the UK legal industry has spurred intergenerational discussions, with some senior figures calling them “entitled” or unmotivated. Critics contend that Gen Z’s focus on work-life balance, mental health, and flexibility goes too far against established professional norms.

Aaron Baer, a partner at Renno & Co., provided a noteworthy example of this tension on LinkedIn, stating that many firms view Gen Z lawyers as “soft and entitled.” Baer argues that Gen Z’s demands, including clear expectations, meaningful work, and real mental health support, are reasonable and represent a change in workplace values. A roundtable discussion in the Law Society Gazette highlighted this generational gap even more by revealing senior lawyers’ worries about Gen Z’s alleged incapacity to manage criticism and their inclination for flexible work schedules.

Despite these objections, many feel that the approach of Gen Z lawyers will benefit the legal profession. Gen Z values open communication, respect for boundaries, and access to mental health resources, according to LawCare’s “Let’s Talk About Gen Z” webinar. These priorities may help create a more positive work environment.

Some UK law firms are adjusting by putting flexible working models into place and giving mental health support top priority in response to the changing expectations of younger lawyers. The goal of these modifications is to close the generational divide and build a more sustainable and inclusive legal profession.

Conclusion

Gen Z lawyers are subtly but significantly changing the legal landscape in the UK. They are opposing firm hierarchy and promoting flattened structures, open mentorship, and resources for well-being. They can use digital platforms like LinkedIn and TikTok to educate peers, discuss legal matters, and expose antiquated practices. Their technological prowess is forcing businesses to rethink not just internal procedures but also how they interact with current and potential employees.

Not all members of the profession, though, are at ease with this change. On websites like Legal Cheek and LinkedIn, senior solicitors and barristers have expressed their worries about whether Gen Z’s inclination for flexible work schedules and tech-first research tools jeopardizes legal education. However, Gen Zers contend that emotional openness and self-care promote rather than impede professional success. They see the legal profession as a tool for change as well as a career, and they are unreservedly advocating for a profession that reflects the society they wish to live in. The question is, can conventional UK law firms adapt?

S.K. Amir is an aspiring writer with an academic background in law, having completed the LLB and LLM at the University of London. She has a strong interest in storytelling and legal analysis, and is always open to exploring topics that require depth, nuance, and a spark of originality.

As the number of non-barristers on the bench falls to its lowest point in a decade, what is holding solicitors back?

Solicitors are joining the judiciary in the lowest numbers seen in a generation. In recently published advice, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) highlighted the ongoing underrepresentation of solicitors within the judiciary and offered guidance for those applying for judicial roles.

According to the July 2024 Judicial Diversity Forum Report, in 2023-24, 52% of applicants for legally qualified judicial roles were solicitors, while 29% were barristers.

Although solicitors made up just over half of applicants, given the size of the pool of eligible solicitors, this proportion is strikingly low. As of 2023, there were more than 160,000 practicing solicitors in England & Wales, compared to only 17,000 barristers.

Furthermore, solicitors only made up 32% of recommendations for appointment in 2023-24, compared to barristers, who made up 40%, meaning that being a solicitor more than halves the odds of successfully applying for the bench, compared to barristers.

While representation of women and ethnic minorities has increased in the judiciary, representation of non-barristers among judges it at its lowest point in a decade, having consistently fallen since 2014.

Why are solicitors less likely to apply for judicial roles?

Research compiled for the Ministry of Justice by the National Centre for Social Research (NCSR) in 2023, shows that solicitors were likely to ‘self-select out’ of the judicial appointment process, believing that there was a preference to appoint senior barristers to these roles.

The NCSR also found that solicitors were deterred from considering judicial positions because of a perceived hierarchy within the legal profession, barristers being considered the most elite, and that solicitors are less confident in their skills and experience, compared with their peers at the Bar.

An interview with two solicitor-judges published by the Law Society, mentions relative distance from the courts as a factor affecting solicitors’ confidence applying for judicial roles. Recorder Ayesha Siddiqi said, “It can feel daunting to apply for a judicial appointment if you don’t come from a litigation background.” While High Court judge Karen Ridge commented, “Perhaps solicitors don’t have the same networks as barristers, who sometimes have the advantage of seeing colleagues take on part-time judicial roles.”

The barriers to appointment

A lack of experience at court can also hinder solicitors who do apply from securing judicial roles. Ridge offers this advice to solicitors, “If you’re thinking of a judicial career, I’d encourage you to consider applying for both fee-paid tribunal and deputy district judge appointments. You can then acquire judicial skills which may assist in your application for more senior roles.”

This echoes the advice given by the JAC, which claims, “Not being prepared or fully understanding the role of a judge is a common mistake candidates make,” and continues by advising that candidates “at a minimum” should “sit in with judges to get a broader understanding of the role” and “observe a public hearing to see how a judge manages a courtroom”.

For top solicitors working in demanding commercial firms, taking on a part time judicial role – or even taking time out to visit court – may seem almost impossible.

The difficulties of preparing for a judicial appointment while working as a solicitor in private practice have been emphasised by figures including Paul Richmond, chair of the Northern Circuit District Judges Association. Speaking in 2021, Richmond pointed out:

“Firms of solicitors are becoming less keen on senior figures taking time out, several days a month, to serve as deputy district judges … Keeping them in the office is a way to stop them becoming full-time members of the judiciary.”

Back in 2009, Sir Igor Judge, then the Lord Chief Justice, also laid some responsibility with law firms. “Before any individual can become a full-time judge, he or she must take on part-time judicial responsibilities,” he wrote in the Law Society Gazette, before pointing to a “reluctance” from senior lawyers “to allow their younger partners time away from the office to gain judicial experience as part-time judges” as an obstacle that prevents solicitors from gaining this experience.

Support for solicitor candidates for judicial roles

Combatting the ongoing issue of diversity on the bench, the JAC runs support schemes for judicial candidates such as the Targeted Outreach programme which helps candidates from underrepresented groups, including solicitors, prepare for the process.

Commenting on the representation of solicitors in the judiciary, Law Society of England and Wales president Richard Atkinson said:

“There is still much work to do to address the fact that the judiciary in England and Wales does not reflect a diverse and inclusive profession. We are committed to seeing an increase in successful solicitor appointments. We continue to work with the Judicial Diversity Forum (JDF) partners to support initiatives which seek to improve diversity and help eligible solicitors demonstrate their breadth of unique, transferable and invaluable experience during the selection process”

A JAC spokesperson said: “The judiciary benefits from having people from different professional backgrounds, which is why we work together with applicants, the professions and the judiciary to help prepare talented candidates for these roles. We would encourage anyone who is interested to take a look at the range of materials on our website.”

Polarised response

When Lord Hodge handed down the Supreme Court’s judgment in For Women Scotland on the meaning of man and woman in the UK’s Equality Act recently, the court was, he said: “Well aware of the strength of feeling on all sides.”

That may be the understatement of the year.

Within days of the decision, which found that the UK’s main equality law refers to biological sex, protests were held outside Parliament and the Supreme Court by trans rights supporters. At the same time, specific lesbian groups, the Government and the equality watchdog amongst others welcomed the decision: the LGB Alliance talked of “profound relief”, and Bridget Phillipson, Women and Equalities Minister, made a statement in Parliament on how the judgment was providing “welcome clarity and confidence”.

Since then, there are now potential legal challenges being considered to the top court’s ruling. Dr Victoria McCloud, a consultant with W-Legal (and a retired judge) who is transgender, is reported in the media to be applying to the European Court of Human Rights on the basis of an infringement of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to a fair trial).

Also, The Good Law Project is currently crowdfunding to apply to the High Court for a declaration of incompatibility, arguing that the UK is now in breach of the Human Rights Act and the HR Convention.

In Dr McCloud’s situation, according to The Guardian, she had sought leave to make submissions to the For Women Scotland case, but was refused. The Supreme Court has confirmed to Legal Cheek that justices do not give reasons for refusing applications for permission to intervene, under Supreme Court rules. The reasons for refusal are set out in a practice direction. Broadly speaking these are: that someone intervening should provide assistance to the court but should not introduce new evidence or new legal issues. Permission to intervene was granted to Amnesty International, Scottish Lesbians, The Lesbian Project and LGB Alliance by way of written submissions.

For The Good Law Project, the organisation states on its website that it has a legal team “involving several KCs and at least one trans barrister” and has already raised over £360,000 of the £400,000 it says it needs to bring any legal cases.

Some of the language being swirled around about the Supreme Court itself in social media and blogs, has raised alarm bells too. Even the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has had to get involved in the fray, telling a parliamentary committee last week that it was “unacceptable” to “question the validity of the Supreme Court or cast aspersions” and that they had handled the judgment “very sensitively.”

At the time of the judgment, the Supreme Court reiterated its role was “not to make policy on how the interests of these groups should be protected”. That, of course, is the role of the Government and Parliament.

The court also made clear that the Equality Act 2010 still gives transgender people specific protection against discrimination through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment or against discrimination or harassment based on their acquired gender.

However, at least one trans barrister, Crash Wigley, at Landmark Chambers, writing on the Trans Legal Project website, raises concerns over the judgment, arguing it will lead to “human rights abuses against trans people”. She writes:

“The judgment has introduced great uncertainty into the legal regime by appearing to endorse trans-exclusionary practices while leaving the human rights implications of such practices at large. Until the legislative situation is rectified, or clarified by further litigation, we are likely to see human rights breaches against trans people in the UK.”

The judgment can be read here.

The Good Law Project, Dr Victoria McCloud and Crash Wigley were contacted by Legal Cheek for comment but gave no response.

Liberty Miles has racked up 80k+ subscribers

A BigLaw content creator is giving her audience an insider’s view of her final days as a trainee, sharing candid updates on her hours, secondment and the realities of life in the legal profession.

With nearly 77,000 subscribers and some videos racking up over 200,000 views, Liberty Miles has been drawing in students and lawyers alike with her candid take on life as a rookie solicitor.

Miles, currently training at the London office of a Magic Circle law firm, is finishing her TC with a pro bono secondment. She first caught viewers’ attention during her LLB at the Exeter Uni, where she began sharing her journey online. One of her SQE videos, focused on studying in London, has almost 240,000 views. Since starting her TC, she’s continued to engage audiences with an insider’s look at life in corporate law

Besides her YouTube channel, Miles has grown her presence on Instagram and TikTok through short-form content showing everything from legal “lookbooks” to whiskey tours on team away days in Edinburgh and just how she squeezes in a run before her commute into the City.

Miles’ other content details how much more work she gets done in her “6-9” after her 9-6, outfit ideas for the office, reading and getting to the gym. She also posts about her 9+ daily billable hours with sleek editing.

Now on secondment with a pro bono client for the remaining six months before qualification, Miles has found more time to commit to YouTube once again, and beat her one book a week target. Her latest video shares that first week in full detail, including London in the sun, a flat redecoration and working from home by candlelight.

In her student days, Miles gave advice to prospective students as she vlogged her time from revision to LLB finals. Miles even gave fans an insight much-needed holidays to Corfu, Lake Como, Rome, and Malta — a far cry from the hours she’s probably been logging since starting in BigLaw.

Speaking to Legal Cheek on why she chose to start vlogging her experiences, Miles said:

“I started my YouTube channel with an aim to help demystify law school and increase transparency as to what it can actually involve and what daily life can look like. That aim has now continued in my career in Big Law and also now on my Instagram. I come from a background where I didn’t have people to look to for this or to ask questions about university and my subsequent career. So I hope that in some small way by providing an honest insight into various parts of my journey I can help others and help democratise access to this information.”

‘POV: you just opened your SQE1 results and…’

Earlier this week, aspiring solicitors across the country received their results for the first stage of the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE). But this year, checking results wasn’t the only thing on their minds—many chose to record the moment and share it on social media!

In true 2025 fashion, the exam day drama has spilled over onto TikTok, with videos showing the highs, lows and unfiltered stress of SQE1 results day racking up thousands of views.

Some TikTokers nervously filmed their screens, visibly shaking as they opened their results. Others screamed, cried or collapsed in relief when the word “PASS” (or not) appeared.

@legallystef Never thought I’d post myself ugly crying on the internet, but at least it’s happy tears THANK YOU GOD!!! Congratulations to everyone who passed and so sorry to those of you who didn’t, but your journey is not over yet! #lawstudent #exams #sqe #examresults #sqe1 #lawschool ♬ 7 years latch – favsoundds

One student nervously checks her screen for the results, before breaking down in tears of joy after passing.

@issssaayyy12Open my SQE 1 results with me – these exams were genuinely the hardest things I’ve ever done in my life so I’m feeling extremely proud of myself ♬ suara asli – favmusicvibes

Another recorded the moment they found out they didn’t pass, letting her followers know that “it wasn’t meant to be this time – remember that’s okay!”.

@kiraa_gulliver Nerves are in full swing ! Good luck everyone ! ##sqe1##sqeresults##law##lawschool##lawyersoftiktok ♬ original sound – shavie

This TikTok trend follows a growing culture of law students sharing their SQE journeys online — from prep course reviews to “day in the life” vlogs and brutally honest debriefs. But the results day clips might just be the rawest content yet.

@austindoeslaw no more multiple choice questions for SQE1 anymore, big big step on the way to becoming a lawyer #sqe1 #sqe1results #lawstudent ♬ original sound – austin

Legal Cheek has previously reported on the chaos that can follow when results go wrong — including a rounding error last year which led to some students being wrongly told they’d failed, with firms even pulling training contracts as a result.

And the SQE isn’t exactly getting cheaper. As reported this week, exam fees are set to rise again in September 2025. SQE1 will go up to £1,934 and SQE2 to £2,974, taking the total cost to nearly £5k — just for the assessments. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) says the price hike is to cover inflation and translating the exams into Welsh.

So while TikTok might be the place to laugh (or cry) through SQE1 results day, it’s also a reminder that qualifying as a solicitor can be an expensive — and emotional — rollercoaster.

As legal challenges mount, US President escalates his attack on law firms

In just the first seven weeks of his presidency, the Trump Administration faced an astonishing 119 legal challenges — an average of two per day, according to data from Just Security, a journal of the Reiss Center on Law and Security at NYU School of Law, which is tracking the litigation.

Since coming to office, President Trump has ordered a swathe of headline-grabbing actions, such as revoking birth right citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, dismantling the foreign assistance agency, USAID, renaming the Gulf of Mexico, and banning diversity and inclusion initiatives anywhere in government.

Now these unprecedented executive orders are being legally challenged — almost as quickly as they are being issued – by advocacy groups, associations, trades union and other parties. A number of courts across the states are having to grapple with the legality of Trump’s orders: whether they go beyond what the statutes say, whether they may be unconstitutional. Though previous administrations have also seen their orders challenged in the courts, the extent of the current litigation matches the radical nature of Trump’s orders.

Many of these cases will — eventually — be decided against the Administration and will reverse the executive orders, say experts. Professor Steve Vladeck is the author of the successful One First newsletter as well as a law professor at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC. He tells Legal Cheek:

“Executive power doesn’t override statute and many of the areas that Trump is cutting through have statutory rules.”

But even if he loses in court, Trump is: “Already winning,” says Vladeck. “Tens of thousands of employees have been sent home, organisations have lost their funding, we have witnessed the chilling effect on DEI. So the orders will get reversed in two or three years, but in the meantime, he has created chaos.”

The question that has been swirling around legal circles is: when a court finds against Trump, would he ever dare to disobey? Certainly, the Administration gives the impression that it would. In one case recently, where a judge temporarily blocked the actions of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Vice-president, JD Vance, bit back on X/Twitter: “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”

But Vance, who attended, super-prestigious Yale Law School (which he described as “nerd Hollywood” in his infamous book, Hillbilly Elegy), presumably knows this is disingenuous. Judges may not control the executive but they do get to determine what is a legitimate power and what isn’t and that could amount to the same thing.

Vladeck’s hunch is Trump wouldn’t directly flout a ruling: “At some point, when he needs the budget to get through, the President will have to rely on Congressional Republicans to make that happen. I sense that disobeying a court order would be a red line for them. So Trump won’t want to test that.”

Trump appears to have an uneasy relationship with the courts and lawyers right now. At the same time as these challenges are bubbling up in various states, he has taken aggressive steps against law firms. He has issued executive orders directly against two of the US’s largest outfits which have been involved in matters in opposition to Trump.

In February, an order came out against Covington & Burling suspending security clearance for lawyers at the firm (a lawyer there had acted pro bono in the former criminal cases against Trump) and, just last week, Trump issued an even wider order against Perkins Coie for its “dishonest and dangerous activity” that has “affected the country for decades” as the order put it (the firm at one point represented Trump’s former opponent, Hillary Clinton.)

There’s more. In the same order against Perkins Coie, the Administration has extended the clampdown on diversity and inclusion initiatives to law firms as reported in Legal Cheek this week. And the penalties are not trivial: the firms risk the termination of government contracts.

Law firms may experience the chilling effect in other ways, such as being reluctant to hire former government lawyers who have been ousted by the Administration (as part of the dramatic cull in personnel in recent weeks) over concerns that the firms will be tainted by association. Vladeck is optimistic about this, however: “Some firms may want to avoid hiring anyone who has spoken out. But it’s possible that for other firms it may be a win!”

What is more troubling, Vladeck argues, is the damage to the reputation of the civil service in the eyes of younger lawyers and students: “For as long as we have had a civil service, its aim has been non-partisan. And that feels under threat now. Will you see good people go into government in the future given what’s just happened?”

Legal Cheek asks those at the top of the profession for their words of advice ahead of tomorrow’s International Women’s Day

As women across the legal profession come together to celebrate International Women’s Day this weekend, Legal Cheek has gathered advice from some of the most influential women in law — spanning both City law firms and the bar.

While women now make up 53% of lawyers in law firms, they remain underrepresented at senior levels, holding only 32% of full-equity partner positions. In the judiciary, women constitute 38% of all court judges as of April 2024, reflecting a 14 percentage point increase since 2014. ​

From securing pupillage or a training contract to making partner or taking silk, the path to the top comes with its challenges. So, we asked those who have made it: If you could give one message to the next generation of women in law, what would it be?

Here’s what they had to say:​

Chinwe Odimba-Chapman, London managing partner at Clifford Chance

“I would say, embrace your journey with confidence and resilience. In my early days starting out as a trainee I remember wondering whether I would fit in. A defining moment for me as a trainee was receiving feedback that I came across as shy. As you can imagine, this is not a word many people associate with me now!

I found that working hard and being determined was only part of the key ingredients to success, I also needed to build strong one-to-one relationship with colleagues and clients.

My background was different from many of my peers which meant I brought a unique perspective and different way of thinking that became my superpower. So don’t be afraid to be authentic, to bring ideas — and be open to trying and learning new things. Think of your career as a journey rather than plan — keep moving forwards and grabbing opportunities, and one day, you too will inspire others with your story.”

Aedamar Comiskey, senior partner and chair at Linklaters

“Believe in your abilities and embrace your different skills and insights. Give things your best shot. Break stereotypes. Smash ceilings. What’s the worst that can happen? If you give it a go and it doesn’t work out, you’re no worse off than if you hadn’t tried at all. Don’t worry about what other people think. You can’t control that. What you can control is your own attitude and effort. Believe in yourself, then others will believe in you too.”

Farmida Bi CBE, chair of Europe, Middle East and Asia at Norton Rose Fulbright

“The one piece of advice I would give to the next generation of women in law is not to choose a specific career path too early based on assumptions about what they think they may want in the future, such as a role where they can more easily balance a family with a fulfilling career. The reality is that firms are changing and more open than ever before to accommodating the needs of their people. So, a role that may previously have seemed unsuitable could now be — or could soon become — very feasible. Please wait and make decisions at the relevant time which may offer more options than may seem apparent in advance.”

Karen Davies, global chair at Ashurst

“The barriers for women in the legal industry are slowly coming down, as they rightly should. My advice for the next generation would be to keep looking out for those who come behind you. Finding a sponsor who truly cares about your career progression can be a game-changer — the people who take real responsibility and will leverage their experience and influence to help you further progress. So when women come to you for advice, mentorship or a helping hand, share your knowledge and experiences generously. This has been a big part of my career journey so far and how I got to the position of chair at a global law firm. It’s likely a cornerstone for the success of many other female leaders too. There have been so many brilliant women who have stood beside me and supported me in my career, and there will be many who do the same for you. Please seek out this support and sponsorship in your career, but also be that support for your peers.

My second message (and a crucial piece of advice!) is something I always tell my female colleagues: become comfortable with the word ‘no’. Women often take on extra responsibilities and while these additional things can benefit you and your career, it doesn’t mean you should say ‘yes’ to everything. It takes some getting used to, but ‘no’ can serve you just as well as ‘yes’.”

Annabel Gillham, co-office managing partner for London at Morrison Foerster

“Get to know what really drives you, what you really enjoy and try to shape your practice and career path around that, rather than being led too much by what you think you “should” be doing or comparing yourself to others. It’s great to have a role model, but perhaps it’s even better to have several. That way you can select different attributes and behaviours that chime with you and from which you can draw energy and enthusiasm.

Also, feel assured that there are plenty of women leaders in law who will happily make it their mission to mentor you. Just ask them!”

Georgia Dawson, senior partner at Freshfields

“We are fortunate to stand on the shoulders of incredible women who forged a path towards greater equality in the profession. Our duty now is to keep pushing for progress because the job isn’t done yet.”

Barbara Mills KC, Bar Council chair

“Three things have made a real difference to me over the years: always be prepared when pursuing your goals, surround yourself with a supportive network who can both guide you and understand you, and look after your own wellbeing. Treat wellbeing as a core skill which you incorporate into your everyday and not only as a way to manage a crisis.”

Emily Monastiriotis, incoming managing partner at Simmons & Simmons

“Be ambitious and resilient, but above all, be yourself. Your unique strengths and perspectives are your greatest assets.

Set career goals, have personal ambitions and don’t be afraid to challenge — but don’t discount the value of collaboration. Ensure that you’re supported — and that you support others in turn, this is absolutely key to success.

Firms like the one I am at have made great progress in representation at all levels — but there is still a long way to go. The legal profession is evolving — it’s an exciting time, embrace it. Your voice will be crucial in shaping its future.”

Workwear never looked so good

Once upon a time, the closest thing lawyers had to a fashion moment was a stiff suit and a sensible shoe — a look that screams competence, if not creativity. But now, a new wave of legal professionals is taking to TikTok to prove that office wear can be just as statement-making as a closing argument.

From tailored two-pieces to effortlessly chic knit sets, these ‘TikTok lawyers’ are showcasing what they wear to the office, and the internet can’t get enough. After years of remote work (and, let’s be honest, a little too much reliance on pyjama bottoms), the shift back to office life has brought a renewed appreciation for dressing up. And who better to set the bar than the lawyers who have mastered the art of looking polished while juggling client meetings, deal deadlines, and the office dress code?

So, whether you’re looking for outfit inspiration or just enjoy watching solicitors turn their law firm corridors into makeshift catwalks, here are the TikTokers proving that legal fashion is anything but boring.

@marygraceolu here’s my weekly office outfit rotation, for my anticorporate corporate babes And yes, I am wearing kickers; petition to bring them back? • • • • #office #officeoutfit #ootd #corporatelife #corporate #biglaw #law #corporategirlies #sqe #lawyers #imnotalawyer #attorney #magiccircle #corporategirlies #lawyer #traineesolicitor #corporatelaw #biglaw #graduatejob #sqe #london #nightlife #Vlog #mayfair#londontiktokalk #londonhotspots #trainingcontract #vacationscheme #vacationscheme #internship #legalcareer #graduate #masters #degree #law #lawstudent #jUrisdoctor #corporatelife #fyp #Ise #Ucl #kings #Ulaw #graduatejob #investmentbanking #Consulting ♬ original sound – Mary-Grace | Law,Fashion,Life

Mary-Grace Olu, trainee at Clifford Chance, takes to TikTok to give her audience a flavour of her corporate (or “anticorporate”) style. Choosing original silhouettes, textures and patterns allows Olu’s office style to reflect her personality in the workplace.

@mylegalcareerI thrive in formal clothes♬ original sound – ☆

Maia Crockford, solicitor apprentice at DAC Beachcroft, gives her followers a flying glimpse into her work wardrobe. Clearly inspired by classic shapes, Crockford dons a double-breasted blazer-dress in one outfit, and a sleek satin midi skirt in another. Her TikTok states that she’s doing a bit of workwear wardrobe renewal this year — maybe there will be another update in the next few months.

@jayslawlife It was time to step up the work fits & I need to start dressing like a corporate lawyer… Pt. 3 of building my corporate wardrobe #fyp #style #worklife #lawstudent #lawyer #lawyeroutfit #corporatelaw #corporatelawyer @Ted Baker @Suitsupply @Ronning @Remus Uomo @Edit Suits Co. ♬ peekaboo – Kendrick Lamar

This work fit check by Jay Heer is one for the fashion-forward blokes. Future trainee solicitor at Simmons & Simmons, Heer shows us how to dress like a London lawyer. The Ted Baker suit is a Legal Cheek fave.

@elliestefanie Corporate outfit autumn capsule with @LILYSILK Get 20% off with my code: Ellie20 #lawyer #corporateoutfit #officeoutfit ♬ original sound – ES

Elinor Nikolova, AKA Ellie Stefanie showcases her corporate lifestyle on her TikTok when she’s not training as a solicitor at NRF. Sharply-tailored jackets are complemented by loose fitting knits and palazzo trousers in this corporate wardrobe reveal. Follow for chic office style inspo.

@lisaingmarinelliOutfit♬ original sound – Lisa Ing Marinelli

Copping Jil Sander and Sezanne for this office fit, Lisa Ing Marinelli is one to watch for fire office inspo littered with designer labels. More high-end than high-street, her corporate looks boast varied silhouettes, oversized sunnies and shoes to drool over. General counsel at a travel agency, Marinelli’s chic style doesn’t miss.

@marieh_osl my own hype woman always #femaletechlawyer #femalecorporatelawyer #femalelawyer #workoutfit #officewear #corporateoutfits #corporateoutfitideas #workwearstyle #outfitcheck #outfitsoftheweek ♬ original sound – Crumbl

Leopard print and black patent pointed kitten heels mark the signature of Marie’s corporate style. A tech lawyer based in Oslo, her account marks the amalgamation of famed Scandi style and modern office-wear — one chic marriage.

@thebrownsolicitordiaries Dressing up makes me productive #workwear #workoutfit #workclothestiktok #corporatefashion #ootd #outfitinspo ♬ original sound – hxmz.x7_ﾒ𝟶

Zobia Yasin, trainee at DAC Beachcroft, takes her followers through her daily office style. One for the traditional law girlies looking for chic, understated office inspo, Yasin’s socials are for you.

@gracieacton OOTD #ootd #biglaw #paralegal #officeootd #outfitoftheday #officeoutfits #fyp #foryou #lawtok #corporategirlies #dailyvlog #vlog #lawstudent #studytok #workoutfits #biglawootd #styleinspo #LTK #ganni #dissh #corporatestyle #lawyersoftiktok @DISSH @GANNI ♬ misses – Dominic Fike

Sydney paralegal at HSF, Gracie Acton’s office style is unrivalled. A 50’s-cut circle skirt is paired with ballerina kitten heels and a boat neck bodysuit. Monochromatic yet far from uninteresting, her looks are infused with a mixture of bow detailing and vintage shapes. Infuse some Aussie styling tips into your office wardrobe by taking inspiration from this chic Sheila.

@iamcaez GRWM Lawyer Edition #lawyer #attorney #lawyersoftiktok #mensfashion #menfashion #fy #fyp #fypシ ♬ fukumean (instrumental) – Gunna

Across the pond, US lawyer Caesar Chukwuma, showcases his daily looks. Harvey Spectre who? Sharp enough to injure any opponent, Chukwuma brings enough style to burn the house down. It comes as no surprise that this American attorney is a founder of his own law group as well as an NFL agent. His clobber says it all.

‘That’s what she said’

So, you’ve decided you want a TC. You’re now on the long, winding, and occasionally soul-destroying road to a training contract — a journey filled with networking events, commercial awareness buzzwords, and the existential dread of the next PFO.

But before you can bask in the glory of a TC offer, you must first survive the inevitable stages of the application process: from the blind optimism of drafting your first application to the sheer panic in the face of the question you didn’t prepare for in the partner interview.

To guide you through this emotional rollercoaster, we’ve mapped out the highs, lows, and inevitable breakdowns —- with a little help from the world’s most unintentionally wise philosopher, Michael Scott.

Sending your first application off

You’ve sent your first application off, and you’re feeling like the Beyonce of the legal world. Watch out Magic Circle, I’m coming.

Psychometric tests

You get sent the link for your first psychometric test and ponder the difference between True and Probably True for 3-5 business days. None of your practice tests go well. You’re now in the hands of the Watson Glaser gods.

Your first rejection

I mean, everyone gets a few rejections right? It wasn’t your favourite firm anyway — apparently the working hours are awful. It definitely didn’t bother you. Onto the next.

Your second rejection

Yep, this one hurt. One of your favourite firms rejected you with a cold, “Unfortunately, due to the high degree and quality of applications …” — you know the rest. Do you really want to be a lawyer? Maybe you should apply for that Master’s degree after all.

Getting your first assessment centre

Oh, you’re SO back. Your ego has the been given the boost it needed, and you’re ready to unleash your inner Harvey Spectre on your AC. Nerves, who? I’m definitely going to get a TC this time.

Rejection (again)

You can’t believe it, this is not happening to you (again). The Watson Glaser gods may have blessed you but the assessment centre gods are fickle.

Second AC

Here we go again. You’re feeling yourself, and you’re back in the game. No mountain is too tall for you to climb — it’s Britney bitch.

Vacation scheme offer

YOU DID IT! First step vac scheme, second step extremely successful law firm partner.

Partner interview

You’re terrified. You’ve never spoken to a real lawyer before let alone a partner but first impressions are everything, right?

TC offer

It was a rollercoaster, it really was. Lots of ups and downs. (That’s what she said). But you finally secured a training contract at one of your favourite firms. I’m not crying, you are.

Trump, Meta, crypto and more

Keeping up to date on developments in the commercial and business world is vital for securing training contracts and vacation schemes at top commercial law firms. Staying on top of these stories can sometimes feel overwhelming — especially if you don’t know where to look. To help you out, we’ve complied a list of five news stories affecting businesses this week, breaking down the key facts and suggesting how they might affect law firms and their clients.

1. Trump and tariffs

During his election campaign, Donald Trump claimed that “tariff” was “the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” Now that the American President has returned to office, economists have been discussing how Trump’s threatened trade policy might affect the US economy.

Tariffs are taxes on goods imported from abroad. Generally speaking, they increase the price of foreign-made goods, making them less attractive to consumers. Governments impose tariffs to promote domestic industries, raise revenue and exert geopolitical influence on other countries.

On the day of his inauguration, Trump threatened tariffs of up to 25% on imports from the US’s largest trading partners, Canada and Mexico. Trump has also warned of levies on Chinese imports and threatened to bring tariffs on EU products unless the bloc increased their consumption of American oil.

All this talk of tariffs has raised concerns around inflation. Central banks around the world have been battling inflation since it rose sharply in 2021. Tariffs are often seen as inflationary because they can cause higher consumer prices which may lead to increased wages and an inflationary wage-price spiral. Trump’s other policies, such as cutting taxes and reducing immigration, have also been associated with the risk of inflation. Other economists have pointed out that, as only 19% of the US economy is made up of external trade, tariffs may have a limited economic impact.

For law firms, this economic instability may dampen activity in certain departments, such as corporate M&A, as it becomes harder to accurately value target companies. Economic instability can also lead to more cautious deal-making, as businesses become hesitant to make large investments or take on additional debt in an unstable financial environment. However increased geopolitical tension may increase demand for legal services related to risk management, international disputes and sanctions compliance.

2. Pressure mounting on UK employers

Doubts around the UK economy have grown following a downturn in the labour market. Vacancies for permanent jobs in the UK declined at their fastest pace since 2020 at the end of last year according to a survey by KPMG and the recruitment firm REC. Figures also show that employers cut jobs following Rachel Reeves’ October Budget which saw businesses bear the brunt of £40bn in tax increases.

Kier Starmer’s Labour government have put pressure on employers by raising the National Living Wage to £12.21/hr for those over 21. In April 2025 costs for employers will jump again as the national insurance rate for employers rises to 15%, with the threshold for contributions reducing from £9,100 to £5,000 per employee. This is a significant cost which will disproportionately affect larger employers.

Additionally, the government’s Employment Rights Bill, expected to receive Royal Assent in mid 2025, expands day-one employment rights for workers and increases statutory sick pay, as well as restricting the use of zero-hours contracts and obliging employers to accommodate flexible working requests.

This pressure on employers may generate additional work for law firms with strong employment practices. The rising cost associated with employing workers may see many businesses looking to reduce their headcount and start redundancy processes. Additionally, the expanded set of employment rights workers are entitled to from the beginning of their employment could result in an increase in unfair dismissal claims brought against employers.

3. Zuckerberg ends Meta factchecking

In preparation for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, Mark Zuckerberg has announced that Meta is ending its third-party fact-checking programme in the US. Instead, the online platform will rely on users to flag misinformation.

The Facebook founder has stated his intention to “Allow more speech by lifting restrictions on some topics that are part of mainstream discourse and focusing out enforcement on illegal and high-severity violations.” He also claimed, “It’s time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram.” Meta will now move to a “community notes” strategy of targeting misinformation, a strategy employed by Elon Musk’s platform X.

Zuckerberg has stated that he has “No immediate plan” to end third-party fact checking and introduce community notes outside the US. Last year, regulation of social media stepped up elsewhere in the world as the EU’s Digital Services Act and the UK’s Online Safety Act came into force. These Acts require online platforms to tackle illicit content and safeguard users. Zuckerberg expressed disapproval of this regulation as he mentioned an “ever-increasing number” of European laws that were “institutionalising censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there.”

This development may affect law firms instructed by clients in the digital platform space as they navigate complying with hefty regulation in the EU and UK while keeping up with this trend towards “free expression” over the Atlantic.

4. Expansion of Gatwick

The UK government is poised to greenlight significant airport expansions, including Gatwick and Luton. Transport secretary Heidi Alexander is set to decide by late February on Gatwick’s £2.2bn project to activate its standby runway, increasing capacity to handle up to 75 million passengers annually by the 2030s up from 46.5 million.

Luton airport’s proposal to expand passenger numbers from 18 million to 32 million per year awaits a ruling by April, with plans promising thousands of jobs. Meanwhile, the contentious third runway at Heathrow remains in limbo, contingent on meeting strict environmental tests.

For law firms, particularly those with aviation or environmental practices, these developments signal a potential increased demand for regulatory guidance. The projects also present opportunities for those specialising in infrastructure finance, as private funding models gain traction. Aviation practices may see soaring interest as firms attempt to capitalise on the budding influx of commercial aircraft into London’s airways.

5. $TRUMP and $MELANIA — The Trumps launch memecoins

Donald and Melania Trump have thrown their hats into the cryptocurrency ring with the launch of their respective memecoins: $TRUMP and $MELANIA. Announced on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social, the $TRUMP coin was launched on Friday January 17, 2025, debuting at $3. Over the weekend, the coin value surged to over $75, making the value of the coins in circulation worth more than $14bn.

Following closely on her husband’s heels, Melania Trump introduced the $MELANIA coin on January 19, 2025. Initially undervalued compared to $TRUMP, it quickly gained traction, trading at a high of $9.30 with a market capitalisation exceeding $10 billion.

What is a memecoin? As opposed to traditional coins, memecoins have no utility outside of their cultural value. They are a type of cryptocurrency based on internet memes, jokes, or trends. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, which aim to solve practical problems or support decentralised applications, memecoins typically have minimal real-world use. Their value is primarily fuelled by community enthusiasm, social media trends, and celebrity backing.

This highly profitable coin launch follows the Trumpian agenda to reduce the regulatory burdens on crypto firms in the US. In December 2024, Bitcoin shattered its long-standing resistance to soar past $100,000, a rise catalysed by Trump’s explicit support for crypto during his presidential campaign. Central to Trump’s vision has been the appointment of Paul Atkins, a well-known advocate for market deregulation, as the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

For law firms, this signals a potential boom in demand for crypto-related advice. International firms can expect an increase in cross-border compliance work, crypto investments, market manipulation claims, and blockchain-related transactions. As banks explore entering the crypto market and global regulations evolve, firms with expertise in fintech will be well-positioned to take advantage of the boom.

What students and lawyers need to know to succeed this year

2025 is set to be a transformative year for the legal profession. With the evolving landscape of legal education, technological advancements, and a heightened focus on diversity and inclusion (D&I), there’s a lot for legal professionals to navigate. Whether you’re a law student, or a seasoned lawyer, these pointers will give you a head start in tackling the challenges and opportunities the new year brings.

What’s ‘in’ in 2025?

1. In: the rise of legal tech literacy

The legal tech market is set to grow exponentially in 2025, making it essential for law firms and chambers to prioritise candidates who are tech-savvy. In the 2024 legal trends report, 79% of surveyed legal professionals are now using AI in some capacity in their practice. Aspiring lawyers can adapt by enrolling in courses on AI, blockchain, and automation tools that are becoming increasingly relevant in legal work.

Familiarising themselves with new platforms could give them an edge. Additionally, obtaining certifications in legal research tools like LexisNexis and Westlaw is a great way to demonstrate technical competence.

2. In: flexibility and hybrid working models

Post-pandemic changes have made hybrid working the norm with many ditching the commute and investing in their own home offices. When it comes to developing hybrid rules to satisfy employee preferences, law firms are comparable to the rest of the sector.

According to a recent poll, 83% of participants said their law firms have hybrid work schedules and rules in place. This is consistent with 81% of hybrid workers’ employers having similar policies. Flexibility is now a major selling point for both chambers and firms. Future lawyers can adapt by learning how to use tools like Slack, Trello and Microsoft Teams effectively. Another essential skill is learning to balance remote and in-office work for maximum productivity.

3. In: prioritising D&I

Diversity isn’t just a buzzword anymore—it’s a key metric for clients choosing legal representation. Today’s lawyers can adapt by participating in initiatives promoting inclusion and develop an understanding of how diversity enhances the workplace and improves client outcomes.

Schemes like The 93% Club, Able Interns, and Bridging the Bar, help to propel the change required to establish a legal profession that is representative of the society it serves.

4. In: cultivating meaningful relationships online

Digital networking is emerging as a smarter, more strategic approach to cultivating professional relationships. Lawyers and aspiring lawyers are increasingly using platforms like LinkedIn, Instagram, and even TikTok to foster connections and broaden their reach. Many have also developed personal brands from themselves, taking marketing into their own hands to build their clientele, outside of their firm and chambers, through dedicated websites and monthly newsletters.

However, concerns have been raised about the over-policing of the online presence of minority lawyers, with some feeling scrutinised or pressured to conform to outdated expectations of professionalism. Such practices risk alienating talented individuals who may feel they need to compromise their identities to fit into the profession. Despite these challenges, digital strategies remain an effective way for legal professionals to maintain meaningful interactions, attract new opportunities across the country, and often see better returns than attending countless in-person networking events.

5. In: the evolution of business development teams

Business development (BD) teams in law firms are poised to take on a more sophisticated and client-focused role in 2025, evolving from traditional business generation to encompass strategic relationship management. This shift acknowledges the significance of the BD and marketing teams, which saw a large growth following the pandemic.

The expanded role of BD professionals will involve managing a select group of high-value client accounts, allowing for deeper, meaningful connections. By dedicating time to understanding the nuances of each client’s unique challenges and priorities, BD teams can work collaboratively with directors and legal practitioners to develop tailored solutions that address specific needs. As the legal market becomes increasingly competitive, the ability to cultivate and sustain these nuanced relationships will be a key differentiator for forward-thinking firms.

What’s ‘out’ in 2025?

1. Out: toxic hustle culture

The glorification of early mornings-long nights, pulling all-nighters fuelled on Red Bull and junk food to meet hard deadlines is finally being challenged. The legal industry is moving away from toxic practices such as bullying juniors, poor work-life balance, and marketing sleeping pods in the office as a perk to attract potential candidates, in favour of prioritising mental health and sustainable working environments.

Aspiring lawyers should focus on advocating for themselves, especially when it comes to setting boundaries, being efficient, and championing healthier workplace cultures. Those who have been in the profession long enough should encourage a ‘speak up’ culture and signpost the new generation to support resources like the Solicitors Assistance Scheme and the mental wellbeing charity, LawCare.

2. Out: attending every networking event

The days of running yourself ragged by attending every networking event under the sun are on their way out. While in-person events can still be valuable, trying to attend them all often leads to burnout and fatigue with little return on investment. Sometimes less is more and overloading your schedule with such events leaves little room for building genuine, lasting relationships.

3. Out: relying solely on traditional legal skills

While a solid grasp of black-letter law is crucial, magic-circle giants and their clients expect lawyers to be multidisciplinary professionals. Budding lawyers should develop complementary skills like project management, client relationship building, and even basic coding, if they want to thrive in 2025.

4. Out: the 9-to-5 legal career

The rigid office structure is being replaced by flexible hours and output-focused evaluation. A recent benchmarking research found that 88% of law firms had policies in place to enable several hybrid working styles, such as: 52% of employees work more than half of the week in the office, 23% work less than half of the week in the office, and 23% have the choice of working from home. Aspiring lawyers can adapt by embracing alternative working patterns but also establishing boundaries to prevent burnout and fatigue.

5. Out: tokenism in diversity efforts

The legal sector is increasingly being scrutinised for superficial diversity initiatives, placing authenticity at the forefront of organisational priorities. The death of George Floyd in May 2020 prompted law firm leaders to speak out against racial inequity and social injustice — a trend that has extended to other pressing issues such as election interference and voting rights. Aspiring lawyers are now more discerning, able to distinguish between firms and chambers that genuinely uphold diversity, as reflected in their staff and lawyer demographics, and those merely paying lip service.

This shift in priorities has also influenced how future lawyers approach their career choices. Gone are the days when magic-circle firms with the fattest salaries automatically topped the list. Today, candidates are more intentional, seeking firms that align with their cultural and ethical values. In this evolving landscape, it is crucial for firms and chambers to embrace systemic changes and make meaningful contributions to equity-focused initiatives, to continue attracting the best talent.

Christianah Omobosola Babajide is a legal marketing expert. She can be found on LinkedIn.

New year, new you

As 2025 begins, there is no time like the present for a fresh start. We’ve got you covered with some New Year’s resolutions to help you plan your 2025 comeback. Make this year your year.

1. Don’t leave essays to the night before

Since your course started you’ve been telling yourself that you thrive under pressure and only produce your best work at 3am. 2025 will be the year that you stop lying to yourself.

Life will be a lot easier when you’re not frantically typing through the night trying to reach the word count before your deadline hits. Next year, save yourself the grey hairs and start earlier. You might even find yourself actually proof reading an essay for the first time!

2. Reference as you write

There’s nothing worse than finishing an essay, your hand cramping from ferocious typing, your head aching from staring at your laptop screen, only to realise you are far from finished… You have left a mountain of referencing to the last minute!

In 2025, reference as you go – your future-self will thank you.

3. Attend all your lectures and seminars

Yes, even if it’s at 9am, even if it’s raining and even if it takes 4 cups of coffee to get there. If you’re feeling crazy, you could even do the required reading!

4. Get those applications in

Vac scheme deadlines are drawing closer and the pupillage gateway is opening up. There’s no time like the present to make a start on applying for your dream career. The first one is always the hardest, so the sooner you start the better.

To keep on top of it all just use Legal Cheek’s handy Key Deadlines Calendar.

5. Come back stronger from rejection

No one likes rejection, but we’ve all been there. Setbacks are part and parcel of life, especially when you’re pursuing a challenging and competitive career like law.

The key thing is learning from your mistakes and improving so bite the bullet and look over your rejected applications. Figure out what you could have done better, dust yourself down and try to improve. You’ll get ‘em next time!

6. Build your network by attending events

It might seem intimidating, but whether you’re making connections with lawyers, trainees or graduate recruitment teams, events are an unmissable opportunity to hear from interesting people and give you an edge in your applications and interviews.

Legal Cheek’s virtual events are a great opportunity to do this, so sign up now!

7. Ask for help when you need it

There’s no point sitting in the library tearing your hair out over complex points of law. If you’re struggling or you have questions, speak to your lecturers and seminar leaders. They’re here to help you!

8. Take care of yourself

You’ll give yourself the best chance of achieving your 2025 goals if you’re well-fed, well-rested and happy. Leave the 3am pot noodle in 2024, eat your greens and get an early night. Life as a law student isn’t easy, so make sure you give yourself the best chance of success.

SQE shambles, NQ pay wars, LinkedIn rows and more

2024 has been a busy year for legal news.

Legal Cheek covered all things SQE, from marking errors to a falling pass rate. We also kept you informed about the war for talent, including the Magic Circle’s salary increases and the known impact of so-called salary bunching. Elsewhere, we discussed recruiter rows, firm rebrands, working hours, and more.

But which were our most-clicked headlines in 2024? Here are our 15 top stories from this year…

15. Exam chaos: Kaplan issues apology after 175 students wrongly told they’d failed SQE

[Read the story in full]

14. City pay war: Linklaters matches Freshfields with £150k NQ lawyer salary

[Read the story in full]

13. Newly qualified solicitor wins employment case against firm that signed probation review without her knowledge

[Read the story in full]

12. ‘I have a type’: City recruiter faces backlash for favouring Russell Group grads

[Read the story in full]

11. Freshfields drops ‘Bruckhaus Deringer’ in rebrand

[Read the story in full]

10. SQE1 pass rate drops to just 44%

[Read the story in full]

9. CMS and Slaughters latest firms to withdraw TC offers

[Read the story in full]

8. Exclusive research: What time do lawyers finish work at the UK’s top 100+ law firms?

[Read the story in full]

7. ‘I failed SQE1 and lost my TC. Is anyone else in the same boat?’

[Read the story in full]

6. Freshfields sets down Magic Circle salary marker as it ups NQ lawyer pay 20% to £150k

[Read the story in full]

5. Barrister Henry Hendron loses appeal against drug sentence

[Read the story in full]

4. Salary squeeze: What are City law firms really paying their junior lawyers?

[Read the story in full]

3. Receptionist who couldn’t pronounce firm’s name loses employment case

[Read the story in full]

2. Newly qualified solicitor struck off for fabricating time recordings

[Read the story in full]

1. Exclusive: Clifford Chance cancels TC offers for students who failed SQE

[Read the story in full]

It’s giving… season

With the festive season fast approaching, there is no time like the present to start shopping around for the perfect gift for the lawyers and law students in your life. We’ve started our Christmas shopping early this year and we are pleased to present you with 10 perfect gifts for your legal loved ones that don’t break the bank!

For the caffeine-aholic

For that lawyer in your life who can’t function without that caffeine fix, gift this handy mug emblazoned with some sage words of legal advice.

£14.97 on Etsy

For the procrastinator

We’ve all been there. Gift your favourite law student the perfect notepad for when they’re just having one of those days.

£17.10 for a four-pack on Amazon

For the student who smells of success

They’re acing their exams; they’re sending off the applications – all they’re missing is a desktop scented candle so they can smell their own potential.

£4.98 on Etsy

For the Denning enthusiast

Who doesn’t love the people’s judge? Aspiring justices and humble admirers alike can pay tribute to a true legal powerhouse with this ceremonial candle.

£11.99 on Etsy

For the aspiring Elle Woods

She’s fierce, she’s fabulous, we all want to be her. Give the gift of inspiration with a print which should sit pride of place on any law student’s wall.

£6.99 on Etsy

For the fearsome litigator

Who said lawyers are argumentative? For the budding disputes lawyer who drinks the tears of their enemies.

£8.00 on Etsy

For the SQE survivor

Smart and stylish.

£23.95 on Etsy

For the SQE candidate

No one said life as a law student would be easy! For that frustrated future lawyer who just needs to let it all out…

£15.00 on Prezzybox

For the Swiftie-turning-solicitor

The chances of securing a training contract might feel like one in a million, but they got tickets to the Era’s Tour! This stylish tote will remind your favourite budding lawyer to “Shake it off” when times get tough.

£15.94 on Etsy

For the all-nighter addict

Whether you’re late-night cramming or coping with City firm hours, you never know when you might need a power nap. This Christmas, make sure your dearest aspiring lawyers are well prepared by gifting them this handy travel pillow.

£9.99 on Amazon

Happy shopping!

From part-time jobs to constitutional law lectures to dance classes – these law students keep busy!

Today’s students share more of their lives online than ever before — and law students are no exception. The future lawyers of the social media generation have taken to TikTok to share academic motivation, career inspiration, and advice on balancing your studies with your social life.

These TikTokin’ law students are also sharing #dayinthelife videos, showing off their favourite lunch spots and aesthetic library study sessions. It’s never been easier to take a peek at what life as a law student looks like in universities around the UK. So without further ado, here are some law student #dayinthelife TikTokers you can be keeping up with…

Abi, University of Bristol (@lifewithabicooper)

@lifewithabicooper Spend the day with me as a final year law student who works 2 part time jobs! Not every day looks like this! This was a very busy day for me! Combined I worked 8 hours alongside studying #UniversityofBristol #law #lawstudent #lawdegree #uni #productivity #study #studyvlog ♬ original sound – Abi Cooper

Grace, University of Law (@uniwithgrace)

@uniwithgrace spend a realistic day with me at uni #lawstudent #univlog ♬ original sound – Grace

Kitty, Queen Mary University of London (@kittywillow03)

@kittywillow03 new yoga set & lash lift makes the day sm better #lawgirl #girlsinlaw #lawstudent #student #unistudent #lawstudenttips ♬ Calvin Roux by Snowdream – Snowdream

Freya, Manchester Metropolitan University (@freyagrayy)

@freyagrayy manchester law school here we go (even tho i ended up in a spanish class this morning oops) #uni #lawstudent #univlog #manchester #lawtok #student #ditl #CapCut ♬ Diet Pepsi – Addison Rae

Regan, University of Glasgow (@reganeve)

@reganeve spend a productive day prepping for my classes with me #university #unilife #dayinmylife #productive #studytok #univlog ♬ original sound – ashley

Sophie, University of Law (@sophie.kyprianou)

@sophie.kyprianou Day in the life as a Law student at Univeristy in london #uni #dayinmylife #london #law #lawstudent #university #cityoflondon ♬ original sound – KBEATS

Sarah, University of Oxford (@sarahlikespesto)

@sarahlikespesto Day in the life of an oxford law student #oxforduniversity #student #dayinmylife #law #fyp ♬ original sound – s

Shannon, University of Birmingham (@aladyinlaw)

@aladyinlaw Spend the day at Uni with me #uni #lawschool #dayinthelife #law #university #vlog #lawstudent #studytok #student #unilife #studyaesthetic #fyp #fyppp ♬ original sound – Shannon

Isla, University of Glasgow (@isla_maya)

@isla_maya Law student life #law #uni #university #studytok #studyaesthetic #autumn #lawyer #lawschool #fy #dayinmylife #studyvlog #campus #glasgow #rorygilmore ♬ original sound – silkelund

SQE, TC rejections and more

Today is Halloween, and a bone-chilling trend has taken social media by storm. While ghosts and goblins are classic scares, people are unleashing their imaginations to conjure the truly nightmarish horrors that might hide within a haunted house. From flickering shadows to eerie whispers echoing through empty halls, these frightful visions are more terrifying than any ghost story.

We thought we’d put a legal spin on the spooky trend sweeping social media—a twist sure to make every law student’s blood curdle.

Because the content alone wasn’t scary enough

There’s nothing worse

Thank you for your application…

Just too hard

Awkward

Aaargh!

There’s no going back

Why? Just why?

Your worst nightmare

Keeping you up at night… literally

Be sure to share your ‘It’s a haunted house but it’s just…’ in the comments below

‘This girl is just vibing at the café, drinking her ginger beer, right?’

Gen Z have officially taken over the world: it’s undeniable that their devil may care attitude and (often) bizarre language have taken social media by storm. Finally Legal Cheek has admitted defeat and hopped on the trend.

In a recent post on Legal Cheek’s Instagram account, the most famous legal cases in the UK have been given a Gen Z revamp. R v Brown, in the words of a Gen Z-er, is “basically” about some “dudes” doing some “kinky stuff”, but the police turned around and said: “you can’t vibe with that level of damage!”

What about the all-time tortious classic, Donoghue v Stephenson? in the words of a Gen Z law student, “this girl is just vibing at the café, drinking her ginger beer, right? Then she’s like, ‘Wait, hold up,’ because there’s a freakin’ dead snail in the bottle .” To cut to the chase, “Snail in the bottle made the law say, ‘Yo, businesses, you gotta take care of everyone.’ True facts.”

Some Gen Z commenters said: “Why do these actually make sense” and “This would have helped me at uni ”.

Check out the Gen Z interpretations of classic case law below:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Legal Cheek (@legalcheek)

Solicitor Shane Hughes looks at the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act and how the legal industry can learn from the aviation sector

A lawyer and a pilot walk into a bar. No, not a questionable joke, but an opportunity to learn how firms and clients can overcome the risk of human complacency when using artificial intelligence (AI).

After circling in the skies above Brussels, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act was published on 12 July 2024 and entered into force on 1 August 2024. Its arrival as the world adopts generative AI is almost timely. The Act provides a framework to regulate the design, development, and deployment of AI systems in the EU.  It applies to anyone selling or using AI systems in the EU, including AI systems located outside of the EU if the system’s outputs are used in the EU. The EU’s approach recognises the ease with which AI may be accessed and the sector agnostic risks it poses.

As lawyers and clients begin using AI privately and professionally, we can all benefit from understanding how an industry with a long history of innovation has successfully managed the human factors associated with automation. The aviation sector, for example, has long been a pioneer in addressing the risks associated with technology and human complacency. Examples of how the sector mitigates such risks include:

1. Continuous training: Pilots are required to engage in regular training and simulations.  This keeps their skills sharp and minds engaged, even when autopilot is activated and doing much of the work.

2. Mandatory checklists: Before every flight disembarks, pilots and crew follow a strict set of checklists to ensure all systems are functioning correctly and routine tasks completed. Doing so mitigates the risk of oversight due to monotony or overreliance on technology.

3. Crew resource management: This practice encourages all team members to contribute to decision-making processes, ensuring that the captain’s and others’ decisions are vetted by another individual. “Crew: cross-check doors for departure” is a familiar phrase many of us know and cherish. It also illustrates how embedding a culture intended to mitigate the risk of human complacency extends to all levels of seniority in the aviation industry.

4. System configuration: Pilots announce and cross-check any inputs, mode changes, or other amendments to aircrafts’ systems. This practice ensures both pilots are in the loop, able to check the accuracy of the changes, and can ensure the aircraft is operating as expected.

5. Remote monitoring: Suitably qualified engineers monitor from the ground the performance of aircrafts’ systems enabling potential problems to be identified independently and communicated promptly to pilots in the air.

6. Rest requirements: Regulations mandate rest periods for pilots and crew to prevent fatigue. Fatigue can easily lead to complacency and errors in judgement.

The legal industry and clients alike stand to benefit by adopting similar controls to ensure their personnel remain vigilant when using AI, including generative AI.  Examples include:

AI education: while people engage routinely in continuous learning and professional development activities, training materials should be updated at pace to address the inherent and residual risks in using AI. This is vital to ensure people of all levels of seniority are informed of the risks, prepared to work alongside AI, and armed with the skills to critically assess AI-generated or augmented content.

Standard procedures and checklists: Similar to pre-flight checklists, implementing standard procedures for AI use can help to ensure all necessary precautions are taken and that people maintain a high level of scrutiny to prevent overreliance on AI outputs.

Peer review systems and team-based decision making: Encouraging a culture of peer or team review can help catch potential errors, oversights, or hallucinations in AI-generated or augmented outputs.

System monitoring: Just as aircraft systems are monitored remotely, lawyers’ and their clients’ Risk, Compliance, and Surveillance teams should consider including AI systems in their monitoring and quality assurance programmes to detect promptly inappropriate activities or erroneous outputs.

Wellness initiatives: Similar to how pilot and crew rest is crucial, law firms and their clients should consider doubling down on their efforts to encourage well-being. Burn out can lead to a drop in vigilance in all circumstances, including when working with AI. Organisations should take steps to ensure their people are well-rested and alert when interacting with AI.

As AI becomes more prevalent and widely accessible, it is imperative that the legal industry learns from sectors like aviation that have extensive experience in managing the risk of human complacency when interacting with technology. By adopting aviation’s best practices, the legal profession can also look to mitigate the risk of complacency and ensure that AI augments people’s skills and expertise.

Whether it’s a lawyer or a pilot, the key to delivering a successful outcome lies not only in the tools we use, but in how we use them. Few of us know how to fly an aircraft, but we board flights eagerly and regard them as one of the safest forms of transport. Why? This is likely due to a combination of regulation and safety record. While the EU AI Act has landed, humanity’s next challenge lies in determining how to mitigate the risk of human complacency when a significant number of people have access to such advanced technology. Lawyers: arm pens and cross-check. The seat belt sign is on, but are you ready for take off?

Shane Hughes is a senior solicitor of England and Wales specialising in white collar investigations, AI law, risk management, and corporate governance.